![ancient tome quark ancient tome quark](https://i.imgur.com/PNLe84j.png)
I don't know who this book is written for.
![ancient tome quark ancient tome quark](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f5/46/61/f5466164275418d40d6c57259549d3a3.png)
In order to tackle this mystery, Gell-Mann tries to run through all of science in less than 400 pages, mentioning things like Bell's inequalities from quantum physics, the ecology of different desert biomes, grammatical universals and near-universals from linguistics, spontaneous symmetry breaking from quantum field theory, and more. Somehow when you travel up the ladder of levels of abstraction, these properties emerge. The jaguarundi adapts to its environment the quark doesn't. The behavior of the quark is predictable as much as anything is predictable in quantum physics that of the jaguarundi is unpredictable. Modulo a few quantum numbers, all quarks are the same each jaguarundi is a different individual. The jaguarundi is an animal that consists of organs, which consist of tissues, which consist of cells, which consist of organelles, which consist of molecules, which consist of atoms, which consist of electrons and nuclei, which consist of nucleons, which consist of quarks. While traveling in South America, he saw a jaguarundi, which is a small wild cat, and was struck by how different it is from the quark.
![ancient tome quark ancient tome quark](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/45403659/67248412-69147000-f432-11e9-80af-11e738f46828.png)
Gell-Mann is an elementary particle physicist who did pioneering work in the theory of strong and weak interaction, most famously coining the term "quark", and received the 1969 physics Nobel prize. Now, how do you distinguish between these cases?
#Ancient tome quark code
That life is built of carbon and not silicon probably follows from the chemistry of these elements that all life uses a particular genetic code with extremely minor variations is probably a frozen accident that most mutations are either neutral or only slightly detrimental to the organism, and may be beneficial in changed circumstances is probably adaptive. The same will be true not just for language but for any complex adaptive system such as life. If we look at linguistic universal and near-universals, some of them will be adaptive, some will follow from human biology, and some will be "frozen accidents". It is possible that likewise, all human languages have shared features that remain from the last shared human languages. Living Indo-European languages are much more grammatically diverse than Romance languages, but they still retain some vestiges of Proto-Indo-European grammar none of them are like Chinese grammatically. Latin had three grammatical genders most Latin-derived Romance languages have two, with the neuter merging into the masculine, and Romanian retains all three, but no Romance language has developed twenty-some gender-number combinations like Bantu languages have, including the plant gender and the abstract nouns gender. A language usually has 10 to 100 phonemes even if there are some languages that go outside these bounds, no human language has a million phonemes: no one could ever learn it.
![ancient tome quark ancient tome quark](https://i.imgur.com/hAHUFZC.png)
Latin had three grammatical genders most Latin-derived Romance languages have two, with the neuter merging into the masculine, and Romanian retai People make positive statements more often than negative ones and want to clearly distinguish between the two therefore, it makes sense for a language to have a "not" morpheme. People make positive statements more often than negative ones and want to clearly distinguish between the two therefore, it makes sense for a language to have a "not" morpheme.